|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Glossary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1. |
Read, View, Listen |
|
|
2. |
Write & Speak |
|
|
3. |
Literature & the Arts |
|
|
4. |
Math Applications |
|
|
5. |
Inquiry |
|
|
6. |
Scientific Application |
|
|
7. |
People & Cultures |
|
|
8. |
Decision Making |
|
|
9. |
Resource Management |
|
|
10. |
World Languages (optional) |
DCFL defines it as follows:
"A lifework plan is a personal information system that will benefit decision-making. It is a living document, frequently revised. The lifework plan should [include] . . . individualized learning plans and/or career development plans. It should provide a format such as a portfolio for collecting relevant materials. Most educators foresee a computer record-keeping system that supplement paper files."
The Lifework Plan is kept by, and required by, the new government-run education system. It contains very personal information about the student's goals and values, and provides a key source for the government to make decisions about that student's further education. The Lifework Plan is begun when the student is in kindergarten, and to be fully fleshed-in typically by the eighth grade. The Lifework Plan is the first "performance indicator" of a state's progress in implementing the federal School-to-Work program.
A performance package not written by the state. According to the new rules, a local performance package must:
|
(1) have a difficulty level which equals or exceeds the state package, |
|
|
(2) have essentially the same content as the state package, |
|
|
(3) use essentially the same methodologies as the state package, and |
|
|
(4) be approved by a method determined by the state DCFL. |
The DCFL has the authority to audit and review local performance packages. DCFL determines how the all packages must be evaluated. In other words, "local" performance packages build the illusion that local school districts have "options" to make serious decisions about what is taught, how it is taught, and how success is to be measured.
An assessment that measures whether a school is complying with the government mandates. This is not a high stakes test. There is no pass or fail for the student and there is no remediation follow-up. Schools are required to give the test to students and the school is measured by its results. However, there is no requirement that your child take the test, and no benefit to the student if he/she takes the test therefore, to protest the new system and use the time more wisely, many parents legitimately withhold their children from the MCA's. (More) (Also, see their invasion of your family's privacy and your options.)
The tests are given to 3rd, 5th and 10th graders.
Third and Fifth graders are tested in reading and math. Fifth graders take a written composition test. The 10th grade writing test is serving as an MCA in addition to its role as a high stakes Basic Skills Test.
Reading and math: administered to all 3rd and 5th graders in March.
Writing: administered to 5th graders in March and to 10th graders in January.
This is the traditional academic achievement test you are familiar with. It is a test in which the scores are evaluated in terms of their comparative ranking among the other scores on the test. Most academic achievement tests are norm-referenced. The ACT, SAT, Iowa Basics and most, if not all, intelligence tests are norm-referenced tests. Scores on norm-referenced tests take the form of a normal curve and are interpreted in terms of percentiles, that is, the position of a given score on the normal curve. In other words, they focus on knowledge, academic achievement, and the detection of individual differences in these and none of that is especially important to the new education system! In fact, the new system radically de-emphasizes (and in many cases has already eliminated) norm-referenced testing, in favor of criterion-referenced testing. This is a key way the new system redefines "success", and de-emphasizes academic achievement in favor of mere job skills. This shift is coordinated and driven from the federal level. (Unfortunately, in the past few years even the traditional norm-referenced tests such as the Iowa Basics are being substantially re-aligned and contaminated by the federal mandates. So, you cannot necessarily count on these old-reliable tests to measure real knowledge and academics anymore.)
An education method driven by the peculiar political goal of achieving equal outcome. It pursues that goal in two basic ways: (1) by focusing on the worst students and the minimum threshold needed to pass, and (2) by largely abandoning students who are above the minimum threshold. OBE was tried (and rejected) in many school districts over the past twenty years, and produced falling test scores on ACT, SAT, and Iowa Basics (which are all norm-referenced tests). When concerned parented became aware of OBE or the falling test scores, they strongly tended to vote it out of their district. Nonetheless, the new education system overrides parents and compels all school districts to use the OBE method (but without calling it "OBE"), combined with a mandated shift to criterion-referenced tests (which will blind voters to the failure of the new system).
Also called "show what you know", this is often passed off as a "test" or "standard". But since each performance takes several weeks or months, it is far too time-consuming to be a mere test. In practice it is a teaching-method that displaces better teaching methods (such as traditional classroom instruction), especially since the new system mandates the performance-based method. It is better described as project-based or task-based. The teacher assigns state-prescribed projects and tasks called "performance packages", which require the student to self-learn in small groups or leave the classroom for lengthy forays to libraries, various local authorities, or job sites. The projects tend to be low in academics and high in menial job skills, such as making phone calls, counting the number of cars through an intersection, or using a calculator. The minimization of classroom instruction frees up the teacher: (1) to focus on getting the worst students up to the minimum thresholds needed to pass, and (2) to do the abundant paperwork and subjective assessments mandated by the new system.
Defined by the new rules as, "a group of assignments and application activities [exercises] that a student must perform to demonstrate completion of the specifications of a content standard." DCFL claims that the performance packages are assessments. This is not true. As the rules say, they are assignments and exercises. They are also lesson plans. They are, in effect, a specific, extremely time-consuming, (and oftentimes bad) teaching method, which push aside other (frequently better) teaching methods. Performance packages are written by the state, in compliance with specific requirements from the federal level. Teachers are required to score them by the rubric system. (See also local performance package)
The manipulation of various committees, task forces or other groups to give the appearance of group decision-making when the outcome of the group process has been previously established by those who are setting up the group and orchestrating its activities. Predetermined consensus is one of the common strategies of central planners and is used to give the appearance of local decision-making when none exists. We have seen these techniques used here in Saint Paul for the new education system. (More)
Data files of student accomplishments, including numerous examples of work on performance packages and the students' IEPs or lifework plans. Portfolios additionally include a variety of other highly personal student records. The information on the portfolios will be entered into a centralized computer system connected with DCFL and other school districts. Numerous federal agencies, as well as potential employers, will have access to this data. The information will be listed by social security number or by a number assigned to the student by the school district. There are many privacy issues involved.
The new Minnesota state mandate that all public schools must teach 78 Content Standards from grades K-12. The Content Standards can only be met by completing performance packages. At the 9-12 grade levels, the Profile of Learning requires the completion of 24 content standards by means of performance packages. It de-emphasizes knowledge and academic achievement, and emphasizes subjectivity and skills. The Profile of Learning is not merely a test or "standard", it is a lengthy, time-consuming, (and oftentimes bad) teaching-method together with a dubious way of measuring success. Its many mandates effectively press the better teaching methods out of the classroom. The Profile of Learning for grades 9 - 12 is the same as the Graduation Standards, part 2. A highly similar system is being implemented in all 50 states, though under various names.
Focusing on educating students in areas in which they have done poorly. Remediation offers a remedy for lack of sufficient progress. It may consist of special classes, summer school, tutoring and the like.
The scoring system which DCFL dictates that teachers must use for the performance packages. Scores range from 1 to 4, with 4 being the highest and 1 being the lowest. DCFL emphasizes that the 1 to 4 system is not the same as a letter grading system. Some teachers report that DCFL expects them to give no more than 5% of packages a score of "4." A "1" score requires little more than a student's participation. The rubric system compresses (into 4 levels) the traditional grading system (with 13 levels, such as B+, B, and B-). This has the tendency of blinding the scoring system to individual excellence, that is, it tends to bunch all students together more as equals. This furthers a central goal of the new system to "equalize" educational outcomes (if only by blinding us to individual differences). The 1 to 4 rubric system is part of the federal SCANS Report. [In Minnesota and elsewhere, the system also requires a strong emphasis on scoring subjective matters, such as behaviors and values, rather than testing for academic knowledge. For example, blended into the student's math rubric score is an assessment of how the student shares his/her work-product with others in a group. This behavioral assessment is blended into each learning area (not just math), which compounds this de-emphasis of real academic achievement, in favor of particular behaviors.]
Acronym for Secretary's Commission for Achieving Necessary Skills. SCANS is the 1992 report of the U. S. Secretary of Labor which outlines most of the new system of education. It also describes the supposed "necessary skills" required for most lines of employment. Minnesota's School-to-Work grant application states that the Profile of Learning and School-to-Work are largely based on SCANS. SCANS is an attempt to standardize job requirements across the country, so that the new system can educate (more narrowly) toward those job requirements.
Refers to the federal School-to-Work Opportunities Act also passed in 1994, the last year the Democratic Party controlled both Houses of Congress and the White House. Like Goals 2000, STW created a system of federal regulations and grants. States can receive these grants only if they agree to follow the federal regulations. Minnesota's STW grant application states that the Graduation Standards are the "cornerstone" of Minnesota's compliance with the STW guidelines. STW dramatically changes the nature and purpose of education so that all education becomes vocational in orientation. Here are some examples. Traditional education emphasizes knowledge and academic ability, while the new system emphasizes skills, such as the "skill" of calling an appropriate authority or going to the library for the answer. Another example is the knowledge of how to do arithmetic, versus the new emphasis on the "skill" of using a calculator. STW also emphasizes that far more students should spend significant parts of their schooling at job-sites, doing job-related work. (This is a major reason behind "block scheduling", so students can have longer blocks of time away from school at work-sites.) STW also sets up a system of appointed boards (largely immune to voters) which bypass legislators and local school boards in allocating money and in setting education policy. These boards will "plan" the types of job needed, and corral students into a narrow education for those jobs. STW aims to apply to all education, including graduate, post-graduate, and professional education. In preparation for this new system, Minnesota colleges have been united under one (centrally controlled) Minnesota University system. Also see How the government sells STW. Also see the Government glossary of STW terms, we have merely highlighted key portions to help you see the immense size and reach intended by the new system.
Governmental favoring (and in some cases requiring) that citizens subscribe to a particular world-view consisting of identifiable political, ideological and/or religious positions. Goals 2000, the Profile of Learning and Minnesotas new Teacher Certification Rules contain a clear state-approved belief-system. The state-approved ideology includes: big centralized government, diversity training, radical feminism, radical environmentalism, abortion rights, gay rights, and group consciousness along with a de-emphasis of national sovereignty, the Constitution, privacy, property rights, and the individual. The underlying theme of all these is to indoctrinate the philosophy and need for big socialist-style government and score students by how well they receive it.
Controlling and shaping people's attitudes and behavior by techniques of behaviorist psychology as developed by its founder, B. F. Skinner. Skinner believed that freedom is an illusion and that all living organisms, including people, are totally controlled by their environment. Skinner said that the ideal society would be one that is under complete dictation by a small group of psychologists who would condition people into believing they were free when they were actually being controlled by elitist central planners.
The 10th Amendment says "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people." The 10th Amendment is brazenly violated by the new education system and STW. The federal control of education / employment / economy is unconstitutional.
EdAction - 105 Peavey Rd, Ste 116, Chaska, MN
55318
952-361-4931 - edaction@lakes.com
- (c) EdAction - All rights reserved.