ACTION ALERT: MN
Nanny State Assault Returns
Like Freddy Krueger who refuses to die in a bad horror movie, the
Nanny State
that was valiantly fought off last year is back in full force. This
year, the over $10 million state takeover of parenting, early childhood
education, mental health screening, and corporate welfare scheme is
coming from big-government legislators from both parties and from
Governor Pawlenty, as well.
Please take action
today!
Hearings are scheduled
this week in the Senate on major
bills that were introduced only last Thursday.
Tell Governor Tim Pawlenty you oppose his Nanny
State proposal!
tim.pawlenty@state.mn.us (651) 296-3391
Tell key legislators to VOTE NO on the bills
listed below!
(Contact information provided below.)
Also call
your own state legislators.
Hearings:
Senate Early Childhood Policy and Budget
Division
Chair: Sen. John Hottinger
3 p.m. Room 123 Capitol
Agenda Tuesday, March 21:
S.F. 3300-Robling: Governor's early childhood bill.
S.F. 3296-Hottinger: NorthStar Quality Improvement and Rating
System.
Agenda: Thursday, March 23
S.F. 906-Bonhoff: Kindergarten assessment initiative.
1. Governors Bill96 SF
3300 / HF 3623
Authors: Sens. Robling, Hottinger / Reps. Meslow, Slawik
This bill resurrects the Education Departments totally bogus
Kindergarten Readiness Assessment with a plan to intervene and
remediate those children deemed not ready. Last session, it died for
lack of funding. Ready4K and the Nanny State backers like Art Rolnik
distorted
the data from this subjective and meaningless assessment to
manufacture a crisis by spreading a lie that 50% of Minnesota
preschoolers were not ready for kindergarten. Here are the main
problems with the assessment.
- Subjectivity Profile for Preschoolers: Teachers rate
children as proficient, in process, or not ready in five areas:
Personal and Social Development, Language and Literacy, Mathematical
Thinking, Physical Development and Health, and The Arts. These
rating criteria quote word for word the subjective, non-academic,
psychosocially indoctrinating Early Childhood Indicators of
Progress that
we alerted you to
last year. We were repeatedly assured at the highest levels of the
Department that these state-defined Indicators would be limited to
academic areas only. Yet they remain in place unchanged on the Department
website, being promoted by the Department and Ready4K to childcare
programs all over the states as academic quality. Those Indicators
are the basis of this ridiculous assessment. Young children who are
developing rapidly and who acquire academic skills at widely varied but
completely normal rates cannot possibly be accurately, objectively, and
fairly evaluated with this instrument. These are Profile of Learning
style content and assessments for our youngest children. For example
- Approaches tasks with flexibility and inventiveness
- Begins to use simple strategies to solve mathematical problems
- Gains meaning by listening.
- Responds to artistic creations or events. 20
- State Required Early Childhood Mental Health
Screening:Requiring this assessment would insert the early childhood mental
health screening that the Greiling/Hottinger bill would add to early
childhood screening, against which
Dr. Effrem
testified on March 9th. This is even more dangerous and insidious,
because it would require teachers, untrained in mental health, to assess
childrens socioemotional performance when experts in the field call
their own criteria highly subjective, impressionistic, social
constructions, and value judgments. Here are some examples from the
assessment
- Shows some self-direction.
- Shows empathy and caring for others
- Manages transitions
- Interacts easily with one or more children
Remediation of Math and Language Based on False Labeling of Children: This Governors Nanny State bill proposes to spend $1.787 million
per year for the state to intervene with children who are not yet
proficient in language, literacy, and mathematical thinking. While this
sounds terribly academic and focused, the money will be wasted, because
children will be falsely labeled based on totally useless criteria.
The criteria even in these academic areas of math and language are so
subjective and broad as to be meaningless. In place of asking specific
information, such as whether the child knows a part or all of the
alphabet, children are evaluated on whether they begin to develop
knowledge about letters. Instead of counting to some specific
number, preschoolers are to show beginning understanding of number and
quantity. All of this will lead to mislabeling a children and
unnecessarily branding them as academically inferior starting at age
three or four. This expensive intervention is at best, worthless. At
worst, it will harm children academically.
Other bad aspects of the Governors bill include:
- Spending $6.1 million dollars in grants to certify childcare
programs to incorporate a school readiness into their
programs. According to reports from many centers around the
state, ECFE and early childhood programs are already offering this
program at tax-payer expense based on these terrible state Early
Indicators standards. They would also certify informal family,
friends and neighbors programs that is, grandmas and aunts;
- Grants to ECFE to teach family, friends and neighbors the
states idea of proper parenting;
- Require the state to teach parents of all newborns the states
version of proper parenting Given the governments dismal track
record on K-12 education, the last thing new parents need is the state
acting as experts in how to parent their children from birth.
2. Expand the Early
Learning Foundation to include
the Quality Rating System -- SF 3296 Hottinger
The Minnesota Early Learning Foundation,
the
post-democratic public-private partnership which creates an
unaccountable foundation to implement and control early childhood policy
in Minnesota, was brought to us last session by Senator Hottinger, and
Representatives Sykora and Meslow, funded at $1 million. Senator
Hottinger now wants MELF to receive another $2.5 million to implement and
control the quality rating system (QRS) that failed last year. Under
SF the foundation will bribe childcare programs, including private
and religious programs, with taxpayer-funded grants.to indoctrinate
children and undermine parental authority with the Early Childhood
Indicators of Progress at progressively higher rates, the more they
comply. (See Ready4Ks latest version of the QRS, now called the
NorthStar System.) The bill itself also states that programs
participating in the QRS must implement the states early learning
Indicators.
3. Screen ALL
Children AT LEAST Once by Age 3
SF 906 Bonoff / HF 1759 Meslow
Senator Kelley authored this failed bill (see EdWatch
2005 update,
Part II) in the Senate last year. It has now been handed off to Terry
Bonoff, the new Senator from Plymouth. SF 906 requires a mandatory
program of early childhood developmental screening for children at least
once by the child's third birthday. That could mean screening at
birth, something
actually being
promoted by
the
Road Map for Mental Health System Reform in Minnesota, also endorsed
by the Governor. Community outreach plans are also required to ensure
that all children are screened by age three.
(Emphasis added). This plan would include all children, whether
they are headed for public school or elsewhere. Senator Hottingers SF
2841 to add mental health screening to the required developmental
assessments passed the Senate committee. SF 906, together with
Hottingers mental health screening, will require that ALL children in
Minnesota be screened for mental health at least once by age three. SF
906 also would implement the Departments kindergarten readiness
assessment as discussed in the Governors bill above.
As we
discussed last year, SF 906 would also require No Child Left Behind
(NCLB) style adequate yearly progress (AYP) based on these worthless
standards.
CORPORATE WELFARE
Besides the indoctrination and mental health screening aspects in all
of these bills, their promotion by Art Rolnik of the Federal Reserve and
big business interests reeks of corporate welfare that subsidizes the
child care costs of million and billion dollar corporations using the
disguise of education. It penalizes families that sacrifice to keep
one parent at home to raise children by forcing them to subsidize two
income earner families and these corporations by paying for ineffective
and dangerous programs. with hard earned income.
TAKE ACTION!
Unless we act quickly during this short election-year session, the entire
Nanny State and mental health screening system will be swiftly slipped
into place for our very youngest children.
Tell your elected officials; regardless of party, that the Profile of
Learning took six long years to repeal, and it was a disaster for our
K-12 students. These bills would re-implement it for toddlers and
preschoolers. Tell them that the state has absolutely no authority to
screen, assess, indoctrinate, remediate and otherwise control the minds
of our youngest children and that you will not cede it to them. Tell
them you do not want the state to impose their non-academic, psychosocial
curriculum on the 80% of childcare in Minnesota that is private,
including friends and relatives. Let businesses pay for their own
employee childcare costs.
These are the legislators to call:
House Speaker
Sviggum (R) 296-2273
House Majority Leader
Paulsen, (R) 296-7449
Senate Majority Leader
Johnson (DFL) (296-3826
House Education Finance Chair
Sykora (R) 296-4315
Senate Early Childhood Committee Chair and author
Hottinger (DFL)
296-6153
Bill author (SF 3300) Sen.
Robling (R)
296-4123
House Early Childhood Caucus Chair and bill author
Rep. Meslow (R) 296-5363
House Early Childhood Caucus Chair and bill author
Rep. Slawik (DFL) 296-7807
For more information, link to these
resources:
Response to Ready4K's
Misinformation
Minnesota Nanny State Tidal Wave Held Back
False Data on Reday4K Baby Ed Agenda
EdAction is entirely
user-supported. The continuation of our work is dependent upon individual
contributors. EdAction is a political action committee. Contributions are
not tax deductible. We promote the work of
EdWatch. If you want to ensure that
our work continues, contact us
here. If you want to
subscribe or unsubscribe to this EdAction e-mail service, mail to:
edaction@lakes.com. Put "subscribe" or
"unsubscribe" in the SUBJECT of the message.