EdAction
Maple River Education Coalition PAC
105 Peavey Rd, St 116
Chaska, MN
55318
952-361-4931
http://www.EdAction.org
E-mail
November 17, 2004
Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert
202-225-2976
FAX: 202- 225-0697
House Majority Leader Tom DeLay 202-225-5951
FAX: 202- 226-5241
Majority Whip Roy Blunt 202-225-0197
FAX: 202- 226-1115
PLEASE CALL OR FAX YOUR OWN MEMBER OF CONGRESS: Their contact
information is listed here.
Thank you for taking the time out of your
very busy lives to make a difference for the future of our children. Our
lobbyist is personally contacting members, but unless they receive calls
and faxes from their constituents, they will disregard our concerns.
Congress has a heap of issues on its plate in a very short time. They are
willing to disregard us on what may appear to them to be an insignificant
issue. We cannot overstate the importance of beginning to put a brake on
the march
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From yesterday's alert:
Did you know that the anti-American National History standards may be
taught to our students in Federal Academies? These standards were opposed
by the U.S. Senate in 1995 on a vote of 99 to 1. Did you know that the
controversial and anti-American We The People: The Citizen and the
Constitution curriculum may be taught to our students in Federal
Academies?
WE NEED YOUR IMMEDIATE ACTION! - HR 1078 Resurfaces
H.R.1078, called
"The American History and Civics Education Act of 2003" would have set
up 12 federal academies to teach the "new" civics and history to
top-performing students around the country. It would have set up 12 more
federal academies to teach teachers what to teach. Then it would set up
"best practices" for teaching it everywhere. (See "Beware
the New Civics")
H.R. 1078 was successfully bottled up in the House Education Committee,
thanks to the relentless work of a coalition of citizens from around the
country who worked together to oppose it. Ten wonderful House members
removed themselves as sponsors of H.R. 1078, once they understood the
anti-American nature of the New Civics.
The lame duck session is resurrecting H.R. 1078. In the waning days
of 2004, H.R. 1078 chief authors Sen. Lamar Alexander and Rep. Roger
Wicker have created a new bill, called "The American History and Civics
Education Act of 2004." The new bill, with the same name and same
sponsors, also sets up federal academies to teach the New Civics.
The new bill has no number and all of the details laid out in H.R. 1078
have been conveniently removed. The newest incarnation of H.R. 1078 is
said to be headed for the floor action as early as tomorrow – Wednesday.
That would mean there will be no committee hearings and no committee vote.
That would mean the reincarnation of H.R. 1078 could be introduced as a
non-controversial bill, and no amendments would be allowed.
Make these points:
Analysis of "We The People"
If you want to know what the passage of this legislation would
mean to our country and to our heritage, look at We The People: The
Citizen and the Constitution, the federally sanctioned and funded
textbook on American Government -- the ONLY textbook directly sanctioned
and funded by federal law.
You will notice that national sovereignty is never mentioned once in the
entire textbook on American government. In the unit that describes what
rights the Bill of Rights protects, the second, ninth, and tenth
amendments are never mentioned. These amendments protect our right to keep
and bear arms, and they reserve all powers not enumerated in the
Constitution to the states and people, respectively.
Then go to Lesson 37 (high school level). You will notice that instead of
national sovereignty, the textbook promotes the "global village" and
promotes world citizenship.
You will see that the lesson ends with this question: "Do you think
that world citizenship is possible in your lifetime?"
If you go to the last lesson in the textbook, Lesson 40, titled, "What
is meant by returning to fundamental principles?" states:
"The Founders, themselves, were vigorous critics of the wisdom they inherited and the principles in which they believed. They were articulate, opinionated individuals who loved to examine ideas, to analyze, argue and debate them. They expected no less of future generations. They would expect no less of you." [p. 214]
In other words, there are no
fundamental principles. This radical teaching of civics and government is
undermining our national sovereignty, our Constitution and our Bill of
Rights.
Finally, you will see the section titled, "What is meant by teaching
the Bill of Rights?" It states:
"As fundamental and lasting as its guarantees have been [past tense], the U.S. Bill of Rights is a document of the eighteenth century, reflecting the issues and concerns of the age in which it was written.. . . " [p. 207]
In other words, the Bill of Rights may have
been useful for people 200 years ago, but it is not necessarily useful for
us today.
It is impossible and dangerous to imagine that the Federal Academies in
"The American History and Civics Education Act of 2004" will not
teach the Federal Curriculum that is sanctioned and funded by federal law