|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EdAction
Maple River Education Coalition PAC
105 Peavey Rd, St 116
Chaska, MN
55318
952-361-4931
http://www.EdAction.org
E-mail
Printer Version
September 10, 2004
Roll Call Vote on Universal Mental
Health Screening
The EdAction alert that went out Wednesday asked people to call members of
Congress to support a prohibition on funding for universal mental health
screening. (http://edaction.org/2004/090804.htm)
The amendment was introduced by Congressman Ron Paul on the floor of the
United States House of Representatives on Amendment A024, of
the "Labor, health and Human Services, and Education appropriations
act, 2005," H.R. 5006.
(http://www.thelibertycommittee.org/update09.07.04.htm)
The text of the amendment is as follows:
None of the funds made available in this Act may be used to create
or implement any new universal mental health screening program.
The amendment was defeated 315 to 95, with 94 Republicans and 1 Democrat
supporting the amendment. To view the members voting for and against the
amendment, please check out this pdf file:
Vote on Universal Health Screening.
From Minnesota the vote was:
Gutknecht, Kennedy, and Ramstad voted to support Congressman Paul's
amendment.
Kline, McCollum, Oberstar, Peterson, and Sabo voted to oppose the
amendment.
The entire appropriations bill then went on to pass the House. The Senate
has not yet passed the appropriations legislation. They will do so before
the end of the year.
Please call to thank those members who supported the amendment.
Though the defeat of Congressman Paul's amendment was lopsided, we
have reason to be encouraged:
- The mental health juggernaut has not been challenged before. This was a new experience for those who believe they have the right to impose screening on the entire population.
- We had very little lead time to oppose this. The amendment was drafted late on Tuesday, and alerts went out Wednesday morning. The public had little time to weigh in with their members of Congress.
- Members of Congress do not have sufficient information yet about this issue. Congressman Patrick Kennedy, for example, distributed false information to other members suggesting that the amendment would prohibit the legitimate treatment of mental illness and that the amendment rejects the reality of mental illness.
- The pharmaceutical lobby is one of the most powerful and well-funded professional lobby groups in Washington, DC. Yet the rights of parents and citizens cannot be trumped by them or by "peer reviewed" scientists.
- Many groups joined together in this effort with a new resolve to work together to put the brakes on the alarming expansion of the role of the federal government over parental rights, particularly in education. This new coalition provides hope for making a dramatic impact in the months ahead.
Please read our Talking Points at
http://edaction.org/2004/082704.htm and get them to your Senate and
House members of Congress. Another appropriations bill will address these
same concerns next year. This and other issues will be addressed in other
federal legislation. Begin to make your contacts now.