|
|
|
 |
EdAction
Maple River Education Coalition PAC
105 Peavey Rd, St 116
Chaska, MN
55318
952-361-4931
http://www.EdAction.org
E-mail
Printer
Version
Washington
Times, November 28, 2003
Math Scores
Letter to the Editor:
Your editorial "Disturbing test scores" is right in terms of its
expressed alarm, but in my studied view, things are much worse in American
education than the latest results indicate. The instrument cited - the
National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) - is a test bathed in
secrecy, but one known to be the product of the most politically correct
wing of the education establishment, a wing with an overriding social-
engineering agenda that puts very little stock in pure academic
excellence.
Where the largest margin for doubt arises is in mathematics. Having taught
for many years in the Washington area in various schools, and this year
having tutored extensively in the more affluent parts of the city and its
suburbs, I can tell you that math
knowledge and proficiency are clearly at an all-time low - quite contrary
to the "improvement" shown on the NAEP since 1990. The public
needs to be educated in terms of how such a skewed representation is
produced.
Because of the NAEP's secrecy, little is known about the material on a
given edition. However, it is clear that the general thrust is similar to
that of several other current national measures, including the Stanford 9.
That particular abomination of an examination virtually forces math
departments to ignore basic skills and concepts and to eschew natural
sequence and key connections to focus on pretentious, trivial snippets
from all over the map (and beyond). The available textbooks cater to such
tests and are similarly oriented (in the name of "integrated
math," a "broad topical
approach" or the like).
A typical high-school-age product of such training does not know his basic
arithmetic or multiplication tables, cannot perform the four basic
operations on multidigit quantities, can neither long-divide nor obtain a
mixed-number quotient, can work only the most spoonfed problems involving
fractions, knows nothing about powers or roots, is totally lost in terms
of positive and negative numbers, can neither read nor write numbers of
more than three digits and (because of such deficiencies) can work no
problems of any consequence at the algebra I level or beyond.
Yet such a pupil (especially if he's naturally intelligent) can do
reasonably well on the current crop of standardized tests because all of
these essentials have been sacrificed to prepare him (essentially by rote)
for the very specialized, totally perfunctory material on these tests -
much of it culled from advanced areas that any meritorious curriculum
focusing on the well-being of the students won't even reach. (And, thus,
such a program will be severely penalized for doing things right.)
In my tutoring of middle-schoolers (through the eighth grade) this year in
Montgomery County, no pupil has passed the end-of-course math exam that
first-graders had to pass to advance to the second grade at the World
Charter School in the District, where I was director of studies two years
ago. Seniors (most taking precalculus or beyond) whom I taught SAT
preparation at an upper Northwest school were given (as a take-home test)
the pre-algebra end-of-course exam, which - over a four-year period - 100
percent of my own students had passed.
The average score of these seniors was 17 percent; one of them could
correctly answer none of the 125 questions (all arithmetic). As a teacher
in the Integrated Design Electronics Academy Charter School, which serves
the children of military personnel from all over the country, I saw
similar results during several recent cycles.
Do not tell me that meaningful gains are being made in mathematics
learning in this country. Precisely the opposite is true. Something is
wrong with any standardized test that shows otherwise.
CHARLES R. LEWIS
Washington
Now the blog at Freedom Foundation:
http://www.freedomfoundation.us/from_the_dc_trenches_2
|