|
|
|
 |
EdAction
Maple River Education Coalition PAC
105 Peavey Rd, St 116
Chaska, MN
55318
952-361-4931
http://www.EdAction.org
E-mail
Printer Version
July 11, 2003
Urgent Alert on "The New
Civics"
H.R. 1078 -- Presidential Academies to Teach the New Civics
The MREdCo July 7th update described the "New Civics" that
undermine America's principles of freedom. (See, "Beware
the New Civics") These curricular materials are being
aggressively promoted as a solution to our youth's lack of basic knowledge
of our founding documents and principles. As it turns out, the
"solution" being marketed to patriotic Americans is the problem.
H.R. 1078 sets up "Presidential Academies" to teach the new
Civics -- twelve to teach teachers and twelve to teach 11th and 12th grade
students.
You might know who has done the major lobbying for this legislation.
It's the Center for Civic Education (CCE). The CCE is the very
organization that has created the radical federal standards for Civics and
Government, which has written the federal textbook on Civics and
Government , and who have written the framework for the federal Civics
NAEP test.
The unelected, unaccountable CCE is reinventing our teaching of freedom,
and Congress is handing them the check. Members of Congress are providing
no resistance whatsoever to this takeover. In fact, some of the most
genuinely patriotic members have signed on as co-sponsors. The
number of sponsors now stands at 169! In the well-intentioned effort
to defend our heritage, they are financing its demise with our hard-earned
tax dollars. Until now, there has been very little opposition or response
to the CCE's lobbying and marketing campaign.
You must inform your members that H.R. 1078 undermines America's
freedom. Please contact your U.S. House members, especially those who
believe in America's founding principles. Minnesota's contacts may be
found at: http://edaction.org/Legislators/USCongress.htm.
If they are not sponsors thank them for not signing on as a sponsor.
Tell them:
1. Oppose H.R. 1078.
2. If they are sponsors of the legislation, thank them for their concern
for history and civics education, bur urge them to remove their names. A
list of H.R.1078 sponsors is on our website: http://www.edaction.org/2003/HR1078.htm
3. Have them read our July 7th update, "Beware
the New Civics ."
4. At your request, we will forward to specific Members of Congress or
Congressional staffers, by e-mail attachment at no cost, our review of the
CCE's textbook "We the People," Just send us your request. (That
review is available for $5 or by bulk rate to the public at http://verimax.us/edwatch/catalog/
)
5. Make these points:
a. Under the 10th amendment, the U.S. Constitution forbids Congress
from involving itself in education. Education is the responsibility of the
states alone.
b. This law would place the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) in
charge. The NEH brought us the National History Standards. They were so
offensive that the U.S. Senate condemned them in 1995 on a vote of 99 - 1.
Those standards were never significantly changed, and they are now part of
the national Curriculum Standards for Social Studies.
c. American taxpayers, in this time of war and recession, should not
pay for more civics and history education when the federal government has
already subsidized a national civics textbook and federal civic standards
through "We the People," the CCE, and the US Department of
Education. Nor should we be rewarding those who have created such poor
Civics standards with a new federal system to promote them.
6. Also contact the House leadership team with the same message:
Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert 202 - 225-2976
dhastert@mail.house.gov
House Majority Leader Tom DeLay 202 - 225-5951
Contact
via Congress.org
Majority Whip Roy Blunt 202 - 225-0197
blount@mail.house.gov
Chairman of the House Committee on Education and the Workforce
Congressman John Boehner 202 - 225-6205
john.boehner@mail.house.gov
How Urgent Is This?
The Senate S. 504 companion bill, identical to H.R. 1078, passed the U.S.
Senate on a vote of 90 - 0 before we even discovered it was on the agenda.
In the aftermath of 9/11 and the war in Iraq, Congress is concerned about
the lack of civics and history knowledge, and this has appeared a perfect
resolution.
Unless you act, and encourage everyone you know to act, this bill is on a
roll.
Additional Information:
The legislation defines the "key ideas" of federal civics
and history. For the first time, Congress is writing actual curriculum
into federal law. Until the public stops them, Congress has no restraings
on its invasion into education.
Distinctly absent from these "key" federal ideas is the
recognition of the unalienable rights of all, the founding principle that
is the basis of liberty and human rights. The legislation states:
"The term `key ideas' means the ideas that shaped the democratic
institutions and heritage of the United States, including the notion of
equal justice under the law, freedom, individualism, human rights, and a
belief in progress."
Unalienable rights are not listed in the proposed federal definitions of
what shaped our heritage, but "belief in progress" has found its
way in. Replacing "unalienable" with "progress" is a
nifty sleight of hand. It is a coup for those with a radical agenda for
social change in our country. The CCE and the NEH will decide for every
American the meaning of the terms.
"Human rights" without "unalienable rights" is a
mirage of liberty. In its standards and textbooks, the CCE emphasizes the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which uses the term "human
rights" instead of "unalienable rights."
From the CCE textbook, "We The People":
"The social, economic, and SOLIDARITY rights included in the United
Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights...are sometimes called
POSITIVE rights. [Positive rights] describe certain benefits that citizens
should have. These rights express the objectives worthy of any just
society." (We The People textbook's emphasis, p. 208.)
The text never points out, of course, that the Universal Declaration of
Human Rights takes the same form as the statements of rights in the
constitutions of all communist countries which place government interests
first, human rights second. Similarly, the Universal Declaration states in
Article 29 (3):
"These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to
the purposes and principles of the United Nations.
In other words, rights are granted by government. It stands to reason, of
course, that what government has the authority to grant, government has
the authority to take away. America's recognition of unalienable rights
was the revolutionary idea that changed the world. Now Congress is
replacing them with a more global idea of "human rights."
Please Take Action:
Contact your Congress member
Congress.org
Send your Congress member an email by going to: http://www.house.gov/writerep/
Get their phone numbers by calling the Capitol Switchboard: 202-224-3121
or by going to: http://clerk.house.gov/members/index.php
Post office mail takes too long in this era of heavy security.
And though the action is over in the Senate, chances are 90% that your
Senator voted yes. Now is the time to make that contact with your Senator.
This should never have happened!
Senate information:
http://www.senate.gov/
Thank you.
P.S. A more in depth discussion of this topic may be found in the book
"FedEd: The New Federal Curriculum and How It's Enforced,"
available at: http://verimax.us/edwatch/catalog/)
|