Home

About Us
Contact Us
Donate

Join Our E-mail List

 

Action Alerts

What You Can Do
Contact Legislators
 Upcoming Events
 
Newcomer Info
 
State Updates
National Updates
 
Search
Links
Glossary

Archives

EdWatch.org

EdAction
Maple River Education Coalition PAC
105 Peavey Rd, St 116 
Chaska, MN  55318
 

952-361-4931
http://www.EdAction.org
E-mail

April 26,  2001

Letter from the Taxpayers League

The following letter from the Taxpayers League makes some important points about the tax proposal being considered at the state legislature to provide 100% state funding of local education.

MREdCoPAC has consistently opposed the Ventura plan for the same reasons identified here. On February 7th, MREdCo testified in the House Education K-12 Finance Committee to that effect. (See our testimony)

April 24, 2001

Dear Tax Fighter,

The Taxpayers League has learned that the House Republican leadership plans to support Governor Ventura's scheme to spend the state surplus on providing 100% state funding of local education.

The Taxpayers League adamantly opposes such a proposal for several reasons:

  1. Surplus Stolen — The surplus should be returned to taxpayers, not used for another huge increase in state spending.
  2. Spending Explosion — If the state takes over 100% of education funding, it will guarantee a double-digit increase in the state budget and increase the baseline for future state spending.
  3. Higher Taxes — This proposal will result in higher taxes now and into the future as the state budget will have to be increased dramatically to cover this massive spending increase. No one believes the argument that local property taxes will actually decrease over time as a result of such a proposal. Experience shows that local units will simply fill the void, leaving taxpayers paying the same or more in property taxes - in addition higher state taxes.
  4. Loss of Local Control of Education — As the old adage goes, the one who pays the fiddler calls the tune. Doubtless, local school boards and parents will have less say in education if the state takes over funding of education. The next move will be to negotiate teacher contracts statewide, making pay uniform from Baudette to Burnsville.

Of course, some lawmakers are going to try to characterize this big increase in state education spending as "property tax relief." That's what they tried to do when they passed a property tax "buy down" four years ago.

They should remember that taxpayers weren't fooled four years ago by such baloney. They responded by voting out several incumbents, and even went so far as to change who controlled the majority of the house.

Lawmakers with short memories might pay the price again if they make a similar attempt to fool taxpayers. They should do the right thing. Return the surplus, and cut income taxes across the board.

Sincerely,

Darrell McKigney
President
Taxpayers League
Linda Runbeck
Executive Vice-president
Taxpayers League
 
 

EdAction - 105 Peavey Rd, Ste 116, Chaska, MN  55318 
952-361-4931 - edaction@lakes.com - (c) EdAction - All rights reserved.