|
|
|
 |
EdAction
Maple River Education Coalition PAC
105 Peavey Rd, St 116
Chaska, MN
55318
952-361-4931
http://www.EdAction.org
E-mail
Plano Parental Rights Council
P.O. Box 250416
Plano, TX 75025
972-491-0203
fax 972-491-5883
email ssa857@airmail.net
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
- Texas
TASB and Plano ISD want parents out of schools!
Battle over control continues
Plano, Texas March 13, 2000
Parents across Texas will be appalled at the views expressed in the
briefs filed by the Texas Association of School Boards (TASB) and the Plano
Independent School District (ISD) which asks a judge to dismiss the requests from
parents of over 600 students who signed a petition for an alternative to the highly
controversial and academically questionable Connected Math Program (CMP).
Plano ISD, in their Motion for Summary Judgment, claims that parents
should leave the role of education to the educators and parenting to the parents, implying
that schools should be a dictatorship of education and that parents should blindly follow
the suggestions and opinions of the educators. This is in direct conflict with the Texas
Education Code's number one objective for public education: "Parents will be full
partners with educators in the education of their children (Sec. 4.001(b))." Their
brief states:
- "Schools are not traditional forums in which outside visitors
such as Plaintiffs may freely espouse their views." (p. 15)
- "Government nonetheless retains the right to set the
curriculum in its own schools and insist that those who cannot accept the result exercise
their right
and select private education at their own expense." (p. 21) [In
other words, if you don't like it, leave.]
- "School administrators must be given broad discretion in
supervising the visitation of the school environment by persons not associated with the
school
(we are to invest
educators with greater control over expressive
activities that bear on the school's imprimatur than other forms of speech or use of
government facilities)." (p.16)
- "If Plaintiffs do not like the text and teaching methodology
of CMP, they do have rights. They can select private education (as Plaintiff Johnson has
done), select a different public school district, select home schooling, or vote in a new
PISD school board." (p. 22)
- "Plantiffs have filed this lawsuit in an attempt to have this
Court require the PISD to teach middle school pre-algebra the 'traditional' way
Such
matters, of course, should be left to the sound discretion of the school board." (p.
1)
- "A minority of parents within the PISD, however, have
resisted the implementation of CMP and are attempting to usurp the PISD School Board's
discretion to set the middle school math curriculum through this lawsuit." (p. 4)
- TASB filed a friend of court brief because they were
"concerned about the educational chaos that would result from permitting small groups
of parents to dictate to school districts the methodology by which schools teach."
Their brief argues similar points:
- "presumably if the Plaintiffs are so opposed to being taught
by the Connected Math Program, they could move to another school district. They could also
send their children to any private school they choose, or educate them at home." (p.
3-4)
- "If a student's right to education is not a fundamental
right, it would make little sense to find that the parent's right to direct the education
is fundamental." (p. 6)
What happens to parents in Plano (or other parts of Texas for that matter) who can't
afford to send their children to private schools, don't have the time to home school or
don't want to move to another district? What options do these parents have? The Texas
Education Code states that parents are "partners" in education. Section 26.003
states: Rights Concerning Academic Programs "A parent is entitled to request, with
the expectation that the request will not be unreasonably denied, the addition of a
specific academic class in the course of study of the parent's child in keeping with the
required curriculum if sufficient interest is shown in the addition of the class to make
it economically practical to offer the class." The public education monopoly must
learn to see parents as valuable customers, that they are "associated with the
school," and that they have a right "to actively participate in creating and
implementing educational programs for their children" TEC 26.001(a) instead of having
the "if you don't like it, leave" attitude that resounds more than once in each
brief.
The Plano Parental Rights Council is a non-profit 501( c)3 corporation
dedicated to educational excellence in Plano. Although the Plano Parental Rights Council
has no involvement in this case, the case has important implications for parental rights
in education and is being closely watched. Please contact Susan Sarhady, Plano Parental
Rights Council President at 972- 491-0203 for more information.
The Texas Justice Foundation, a non-profit litigation group, has been
representing the six parents in the Plano case. To contact TJF, call (210) 614- 7157.
____________________________________________________________
Webmaster's note: The following is a press release from a Parent's Rights group
in Texas. For background on this case, and on its underlying issue, the Connected
Math Program, see our article: School District lawyers play
hard-ball with Texas parents
Webmaster's 2nd Note: We received an update from the parent's group discussed
below. They write:
"Plano Independent School District filed an appeal to their motion
for qualified immunity which was denied in district court so that delayed the trial that
was originally scheduled for Nov. 6, 2000. Oral arguments in the appeal are
tentatively scheduled for the week of March 5, 2001 -- this is in the 5th Circuit court in
New Orleans. The Judge here ruled prior to that time that depositions had to
proceed. We've gotten copies of most of them and posted them on our website.
For updates on the lawsuit, you can
check out our website. The depositions are there as well." (Update received Jan 31,
2001 from the Plano Parental Rights Council)
|